Todos en algún momento hemos tenido que pasar por esa experiencia de sentirnos pocos o como “ave rara en peligro de extinción”. Eso nos ocurre en todos los aspectos de nuestra vida.
Pasar por una Universidad donde se refleja un “sentimiento Anti-Americano” no será la unica vez que te sientas solo o abandonado. No obstante, cree en lo que alguien sabio dijo…”Aquello que no te mata TE HARA FUERTE”.
Veras que la “mayoria silente” se nutre de de su fuerza interna y el disidente se nutre de la “cantata minoritaria”, y que el odio o menosprecio o antiamericanismo es una convicción adquirida que surge mayormente por indoctrinación, o por falta de auto estima, o por ignorancia, o por la ingratitud (aquel que muerde la mano a quien le da de comer).
No obstante lo anterior, respétales y escúchales, para que ellos te respeten y escuchen. Disiente cuando debas darte a respetar, se su amigo disidente y ayudalos a comprender que la verdad no grita, sino convenze.
Thursday, March 10, 2011
My personal perspective and views about abortion and 'personhood'
Tuesday 15th February 2011The life of both, the mother and of a child is sacred.
A woman has a right to choose what is best for her but she has to work her way in, not make this depending life pay with his unborn life for her or the parents comfort zone.
With very few exceptions, that spark of life didn't come uninvited. Normally, It is the by product of 2 cells that get there by an act of 2. An unborn can't pay for for 2 people's mistake. It is like making the kids pay for the sin of its parents.
Conception can be prevented nowadays as easy as pie,given free in many clinics and if in one way eugenics (which is a double sword) should play something positive, is by PREVENTING, rather than Terminating.
Roe v Wade (legal perspective) is a 40 yrs case which should be reviewed,and its effect has been restricted with other cases and laws for at that time, science didn't count with so many factual or scientific information.
On the other hand humankind didn't count with a present society that annually , only in the USA terminates +or- 2 million babies. This is Human carnage that should have been greatly avoided if society was more respectful of what a human life is. see percentages and motives. http://fwd4.me/voo
The abortion effects is, li devastating in terms of society as a whole, and demoralizing to the value of a human being life and worth, for the contemplated motives lies mainly in the comfort of the mother, family and peers.
We have been an irresponsible society, because far from those terminations, if availability for contraceptives exists actually in a greater and cheaper rate, and they do, why then not assume a responsible approach to the unborn life?
This is why I disagree so greatly from the p2 and liberals. I do respect the choice of woman as long they respect the life of the unborn.
A heartbeat in the unborn can be heard as soon as 18 days of gestation. This is proven today, scientifically.
If planned family clinics would, with d aid of govt or private, engage in the aid of anti-conceptives, instead of having abortion clinics open like cafeterias, it would REDUCE the amt of abortions.
Maybe my ideas are more liberal than other pro life. Some (Catholics) r starting to accept condoms. Catholics and some Christians do not accept new anti-conceptives that we know effective and non abortion methods within scientific terms. IMO, they should be used by the sexual actives. BUT WE know that 90% abortions could have been prevented by a responsible active sex life.
Summarizing; a person is worth, as soon as the science, the law, and society accepts its facts and truths, and act responsibly to that life; being either an 18 days unborn with a beating heart, or a 45 yrs person whose heart is beating but in coma for was involved in an accident, to that old 85 yrs whose heart beats but can hardly move for his time to stop beating is coming when his body says so, or because he, willingly has decided till when he should live.
Life is an amazing miracle, but it takes a mother to help d unborn grow.
Perusing "Abortion against Anti-Conceptives"
I’m a Christian. I was raised as a Catholic. This upbringing brought the best in me,for the discipline, values and morals you, can't be erased easily.
Notwithstanding the above, I have to accept that the Roman Catholic Church should put up to date and accept that actual science has gone further than what they can handle. This personal opinion could be debatable, but, indubitably discarded in its entirety.
Yet, there is a logical misunderstanding between a person and “personhood”, which no pro choicer abortionist can debate or refute, and all they do is justify, beat around, or simply discredit the pro lifer in the personal aura.
Peter Kreeft, Ph.D., is a professor of philosophy at Boston College.
This philosopher explains the terms in a logical way. Though a little long, it can definitively ascertain that a fetus/ embryo, spark of life/unborn is a person.
Pro abortionist will never accept this conclusion because they rely on Man made laws.
But, this is the interpretation of the philosophical way to approach and understand God's law, and although modern science can emulate and start some stages of conception, it may never at least on a near future either, be able to clone the whole process of all the stages to make a living human being.
http://catholiceducation.org/articles/abortion/ab0004.html
February 26, 2011 10:02 PM
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
